Research Methodology and Methods Explored in Postgraduate Student Webinar

Research Methodology and Methods Explored in Postgraduate Student Webinar

In a bid to enhance the research acumen of UKZN postgraduate students, the African Centre for Food Security (ACFS) hosted an illuminating webinar on research methods and methodologies. Spearheaded by Professor Eddy Bruno Esien from the Pan African University, Cameroon, the seminar delved deeply into the nuances of conducting effective research, emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration and the alignment of methodology with research problems.

ACFS Director Professor Joyce Chitja set the stage by underscoring the critical need for interdisciplinary approaches and collaboration in addressing food security challenges. With a focus on the six pillars of food security – availability, access, stability, utilisation, agency and sustainability – she stressed the importance of clear policy recommendations and global collaboration.

In his subsequent webinar, Esien commenced with a discussion of Greek philosopher Plato’s allegory of the Cave. This was presented as a metaphor for critical thinking, to encourage participants to challenge conventional perspectives. Students reflected on the allegory’s significance, highlighting the emancipatory journey from ignorance to enlightenment. Esien further emphasised the role of critical thinking and self-reflection in shaping rigorous research methodologies.

Having challenged perceptions, Esien led a discussion on research methodology and ontology, highlighting the fundamental distinctions between quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, which are rooted in their unique ontologies and epistemologies. He elaborated on the importance of aligning research methodologies with a study’s underlying ontological assumptions, cautioning against methodological mismatches that could compromise research integrity.

A critical aspect of the seminar was the exploration of epistemology in research, where Esien clarified the epistemological differences between qualitative subjectivity and quantitative objectivity. The discussion touched on empiricism, rationalism, constructivism and positivism, underscoring their respective influences on research methodologies and knowledge creation.

Esien also addressed the integration of mixed methods in scientific inquiry, highlighting that such approaches should be guided by a clear understanding of the research problem. He cautioned against superficial application of mixed methods, advocating for a nuanced approach that combines quantitative rigour with qualitative depth to triangulate findings effectively.

Looking ahead, Chitja announced plans for future collaboration with Esien aimed at further refining research philosophies and methodologies at the ACFS. Participants were encouraged to utilise the resources shared during the seminar, including presentation slides and recordings, to enhance their research competencies.

Participants agreed that the webinar was a pivotal event for postgraduate students aiming to elevate their research skills. By emphasising interdisciplinary collaboration, critical thinking and methodological alignment with research problems, it equipped the postgraduate cohort with the tools necessary to undertake impactful research not only in the realm of food security but beyond.

Chitja commented that as the ACFS prepares for future engagements and workshops, the insights gleaned from this webinar would help shape the future research methodologies adopted by her students, ensuring that they are not only proficient in their chosen methods but also ethical and conscientious in their pursuit of knowledge.

For more information on forthcoming workshops and collaborations with Professor Eddy Bruno Esien, visit the African Centre for Food Security’s website.

Words: Sally Frost

Photographs: Supplied